This comic is great.
We submit that climate change is occurring because we take biased and
inaccurate measurements, which we then use in computer models we like while we
ignore the ones we don’t like. Then we
apply the output to long-range economic models that have never accurately
predicted any economic data.
So, yes, climate science is definitely still up for debate.
America is twenty trillion dollars in debt. Yes, $20 plus 13 zeroes. We can band-aid our problem by cutting the
EPA by 5% or negotiating the cost of fighter jet. We can argue about these cuts in DC and on
twitter ad nauseum, but the real hard truth here is that these cuts are mere
drops in the bucket compared to our biggest budget line items – the military
and the welfare state.
“Ideally, Americans would look squarely at the
fact that the U.S. federal government has both an unsustainable welfare state
at home AND an unsustainable military empire abroad. Both
of these cannot continue ad infinitum.
Something is going to break someday and keeping these two monsters going will only hasten that day.”
Something is going to break someday and keeping these two monsters going will only hasten that day.”
The conclusion of this article is the unfortunate truth.
“So we'll either stop this by logically
unwinding the military empire first, and giving people a chance to wean off of
dependency and return to reality, or we'll wait until reality bites us harder
than ever before.
History is replete with examples of people choosing the latter. It's like watching a dog chase its tail.
History is replete with examples of people choosing the latter. It's like watching a dog chase its tail.
But it doesn't have to be that way.”
I ask my millennial peers to claim what’s ours. Demand our leaders to 1) focus on reducing
America’s military role as the World’s Keeper; then 2) reform our social
programs by enabling people to be self-reliant, and returning these programs to
their roots of safety nets for only those who cannot do for themselves.
Legalizing insider trading is something we can only do in a
stateless society.
My jury is still out on the moral and economic consequences
of legalizing insider trading, but I am more than willing to let some group
experiment with this.
Father Guido Sarducci is on point!
No comments:
Post a Comment