Three takeaways:
1.
Let the investigations uncover and implicate
before we jump to conclusions
2.
Calm down. The US has meddled in 81 elections
(that we know of – so almost certainly underestimating) in the last couple
decades.
3.
Be careful what you wish for.
I watched the whole debate the other day and thoroughly
enjoyed it. I side with Caplan.
1.
Individuals have rights.
2.
States or collectives do not have rights.
3.
Individuals do not derive their rights from
being a part of the group.
4.
Immigration being completely free is in fact the
moderate point of view.
“Far from being utopian, saying ‘Immigration is a
human right’ is just the moderate, common-sense position that when natives and
foreigners voluntarily interact, strangers are morally obliged to leave them
alone unless the overall consequences are clearly awful.”
I confess this is one area in which my thinking has changed
radically. I used to be for strong
borders but now I question the very premise of believing the state has a true
power at all. My ideology continually evolves to an increasingly unwavering
view of private property and individual rights.
If you refuse to believe that Trump was not wiretapped by
the intelligence departments, you need to read this.
1)
No, we don’t have proof. We may eventually, we may not.
2)
The Intelligence Communities do listen to
everyday Americans regularly.
3)
Based on 2) and regardless of any wild
conspiracy theories, we can say with confidence that it is likely they did
listen in on Trump.
4)
And they have lied, and will continue to do so, when
asked to testify on this topic.
How people fail to see this is beyond me.
No comments:
Post a Comment