Friday, March 3, 2017

Sessions Should Go But It Has Nothing To Do With Talking to Russia

This is a great article on what causes economic bubbles.  It is very easy to read.
“Bubbles Aren't Created by Price Increases — They're created by Misallocation of Resources.”
Expanding the money supply creates a platform for bubbles. This extra money does not in and of itself create bubbles. But it does culminate in money being diverted away from productive activities in order to fund unproductive activities. Applying this logic, then, bubble bursting is actually good for those who produce truly economically value because it frees up money that was formerly being funneled toward unproductive activities. 

Schumer is correct.  Sessions should resign for the good of the country. 
Schumer is, however, wrong on why.  And it has nothing to do with this Russia contact hoopla which is all stupid, unimportant, irrelevant and a political hack.
But it does have to do with Sessions’ plan to crack down on drug laws.  If he had any brains, which as a politician he likely does not, he would do everything in his power to legalize all drugs.  Why?
-                      To save taxpayers millions of dollars,
-                      To save hundreds if not thousands of lives , and
-                      To reduce the number of people who suffer from addiction and other effects resulting from a black market for drugs.
Take a look at Portugal if you don’t buy these arguments.  All these reasons are on the cost benefit analysis of this but don’t even mention the right people have to do what they want to their own bodies.

If this partisan flip-flop weren’t so scary, it would almost be amusing. This chart from the article presents a clear picture of partisanship gone haywire.  Truly explains everything wrong with the path the US is on.  Sad!

People with ancestry in Iceland, Scotland and Denmark are tagged “Caucasians,” which would be accurate only for people from the Caucuses region, such as the Boston Marathon bombers, or Stalin. According to this geographical pattern, people with ancestry in Spain should be classified as “Iberians” but they are not. They are “Latinos,” but in the current system people such as Antonin Scalia, Madonna, and Frank Sinatra, all with ancestry in Italy, home to the plain of Latium, are not “Latinos.” They too are “Caucasians” or “whites.” Many “Latinos” or “Hispanics,” a linguistic term, are whiter than the late Senator Robert Byrd, a former Ku Klucker. Even so, in the USA they can become “people of color.” None of this makes any sense but those who advance it have purposes in mind.” 

What unites us is our humanity.  What divides us is our identification of differences.  

Thursday, March 2, 2017

The Sky Isn't Falling Afterall

AV à I am shocked.  The mainstream media, for the first time, did not report with a knee jerk negative reaction to President Trump.  I didn’t listen to the full State of the Union address so I don’t really have opinions on it yet, but I am surprised the main outlets called it presidential and hopeful. 

I was told I would be surprised by this chart, but I am not.  My guesses would have been very close on US, China, Japan, Germany, France, and UK.  India I would have overestimated.

Two quotes for you:
“The United States of America has maintained this enormous share of the world's output for at least two generations. What more could anybody ask from an economy? The rest of the world has increased its output to a degree that would not have been conceivable in 1950. This is especially true of China. It is also true of Western Europe. Nevertheless, for all of this increase in output, the United States of America is still the biggest player of all. We are not falling behind.”
“Conclusion: there are legitimate things to be concerned about, but economic growth is not one of them. Western civilization is not verging on collapse. Neither is the world economy.”

This phenomenon even hurts public schools. According to the Friedman Foundation for School Choice, of 33 studies that analyzed the effect of competition on public schools, 31 found that public schools improved. When institutions have to earn their audience, they find ways to improve; when they’re protected from competition, they stagnate.”

Takeaway: School choice benefits ALL schools, even the government-run public schools, by introducing some competition.  

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

Political Incorrectness

Ending foreign aid will do more to help people in impoverished nations than all the aid we have given since the founding of this country.  Foreign aid simply lines the pockets of corrupt foreign leaders.   It does not help the people.

Van Jones on safe spaces.  He is correct.  You should be physically safe, but that does mean ideologically safe.  We have the right to our own opinions. He sounds classically liberal or libertarian, not really leftist, in this.  I like it.

I’m on board with the Trump protesters, not because they are resisting Trump specifically, but because they are resisting the power of the executive branch of government.”
Predictably, the republicans have put forth an absolutely miserable plan for health insurance. It's terrible simply because it is a central plan.

“Just because Obama and the Democrats tried to nationalize health care doesn’t mean Republicans should tie themselves in knots trying to make Obamacare palatable—or functional. If they really want it, let the states have at it.”
The proper health insurance plan is no plan at all.  Let the people decide.  That is my opinion. 
What is fact is that health insurance should be decided by the states.  We should have 50 different laboratories of health insurance.  We can have California on single payer and Texas on no plan at all and other states somewhere in between.  That is Constitutional.

Dennis Prager with some wisdom:
All this leads to a particular rule, which is, in order to maintain a low crime rate and social stability, a country has only two choices: Do not allow immigrants into the country, or allow immigrants into the country, but be certain to assimilate them into the native population as quickly as possible.
If you want to understand the immigration crisis, just know that because the left has undone the second choice, it has made the first choice — Japan’s choice — look tenable to many for the first time in American history.”
As Prager points out, the left cries, “We are a nation of immigrants” while blatantly ignoring the second half of the sentence: “who assimilate into America.”  The more we identify and focus on differences, praising diversity and multiculturalism, the more we divide ourselves That is human nature.  Of course, diversity adds value to all our lives - as long as there is a common unifying factor.  IMO our unifying factor is we are alL humans entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  This is btw not a uniquely American view, explaining why we see the assimilation portion of the statement.
Personally, I don’t necessarily think we need to assimilate into America, but there is something to be said for assimilating into people that love and respect each other.

This absolutely has to be from the Onion.  People are going to drop rocks from the moon and kill people on Earth and Guam is going to become so overpopulated that it capsizes….?  These morons.  Give me a break.

Chris Rossini makes a very good point.  As good as it might feel to spite the media, we should never be happy when the government extends its power.  Despite how dumb they might be or how much propaganda they push, the media does not have the power to tax us, draft us into an army, seize our assets “lawfully’ through civil asset forfeiture and more.  The government is the enemy at the end of the day.

I 100% agree with Walter Williams’ enlightening explanation for why we have race relation issues.  Government always yields a one size fits all solution, which inevitably leads to conflict. 
“The prime feature of political decision-making is that it's a zero-sum game. One person's gain is of necessity another person's loss. … As such, political decision-making and allocation of resources is conflict enhancing while market decision-making and allocation is conflict reducing. The greater the number of decisions made in the political arena, the greater the potential for conflict.”
Williams further points out that ethnicity, color, religion and regional differences, which create horrific wars is other countries, have not been the genesis for the same behavior in America’s melting pot.  Why?

“A good part of the answer is that in the United States, there was little to be gained from being a Frenchman, a German, a Jew, a Protestant or a Catholic. The reason it did not pay was because for most of our history, government played a small part in our lives. When there's significant government allocation of resources, the most effective means of organizing for the gains are those proven most divisive, such as race, ethnicity, religion and region.”

Tuesday, February 28, 2017

Quote of the Day 2.28.17

"There are only two major parties today: The stupid party and the evil party.  Once in a while the two parties get together and do something that is both stupid and evil.  That is called bipartisanship." - Tom Woods

Priorities


“Good manners and respect are the answer to a civil society, not inclusion and diversity.”

I could not agree more!  Inclusion and diversity do not mean a damn thing for a civilized society.  If I don’t include you, but I still respect you, I cannot do anything to physically harm you.  Providing a safe environment for all to pursue their individual freedoms is what constitutes a good and just society.  Most of us, myself included, personally enjoy diversity in many aspects of our lives.   That does make it a requirement for civil society.


World-wide debt now exceeds 3 times the amount of world-wide GDP.
  à THIS IS NOT SUSTAINABLE.

Governments cannot continue to fabricate enough money to ever pay down their debts.  Across a long enough future timeline, ALL governments will default on their debt.

Thursday, February 23, 2017

The Russia Ordeal

I think this hits the nail on the head regarding Russia.
1)                  Russia is neither friend nor foe.
2)                  Russia did interfere in the presidential election because they don’t want to go to war with us (which was expected to happen with Clinton.) 
3)                  The US interferes in other country’s elections, including Russia. 
4)                  We should want Russia as a friend not as a foe.  They fight better than the European’s, so if we do go to war, let’s have Russia fighting with us not against us. 
5)                  Undoubtedly, the deep state has reason to pick fights with Russia.
These are basic principles and facts.  None are really debatable.  I am not sure why this Russia thing has turned into a big hoopla.  Well actually I do know – politicians are dumb and McCain, Graham and the deep state have a continued interest in war.
This podcast is correct on what I wrote above.  It is correct on essentially. 
If you are easily offended:
1.    Get over it.
2.    If you can’t get over it (trigger warning), don’t listen.  Also, you are an ignorant baby. 
3.    If you identify as either republican or democrat, you will be offended and, if you are honest, you will also realize you are an idiot.
This is an awesome podcast.  (Note: this will only be available for the next 5 weeks or so.) (Note #2: I really love the intro music on this podcast it really just drives home the idiocy all politicians have caused.)
Great news.  The uber of healthcare.  This is why I love the free market.  Identify a need; offer a concept to fill the need.  Sounds simple. This is how the market works no matter what the policy-makers try to do to curtail human freedom and prosperity. 
Good for you Marc Cuban.
“Universal basic income (UBI) is ‘the worst possible response’ to the unemployment likely to be caused by robots and artificial intelligence.”
Finally, we have a big name with a loud voice, expressing some common sense! 
Don Boudreaux points out that central heating destroyed many jobs when it came around just as robots will in coming years.  This is precisely a benefit for everyone.
The CBO has historically underestimated future debt by a huge margin. Judging by their past optimistic errors, the real debt in 2027 will likely not be $30 trillion, but $75 trillion.”
They underestimate total debt on average 250%, overstate tax revenue 25% and in the 170 projections made in the office’s history, all 170 have underestimated debt.  This is likely somewhat due to partisanship but also it’s an impossible task. The lunacy of politicians expands at an increasing rate.
Tyler Cowen is extremely insightful.  Governments can purposely leak information to get it out to the public without answering questions.  If you prosecute leakers too much you get less leaks which leads to the only leaks being the leaks sanctioned by government at which point everyone realizes that the only leak would be a government sanctioned leak and then is no longer a leak.  Interesting thinking.
That there are benefits of central banking for certain groups is pretty obvious. Leland Yeager in his preface to the Liberty Fund edition of Smith’s book pointed out that it is reasonable to suppose that central banks are valued today, among other things, for providing prestigious and comfortable job opportunities for economists. Nothing is so bad that it couldn’t get worse.”
We need to end the Fed ASAP.   Just as the military industrial complex has an incentive to be hawkish towards other countries, economists and central bankers in general have an incentive to say we need the Fed.  In both cases, the beneficiaries are enriched at the expense of the common man.
7 Earth-Like planets discovered.  This is pretty cool.
How many of these do you fall for?
1.       Deficits are the cause of inflation; deficits have nothing to do with inflation.
2.       Deficits do not have a crowding-out effect on private investment.
3.       Tax increases are a cure for deficits.
4.       Every time the Fed tightens the money supply, interest rates rise (or fall); every time the Fed expands the money supply, interest rates rise (or fall).
5.       Economists, using charts or high speed computer models, can accurately forecast the future.
6.       There is a tradeoff between unemployment and inflation.
7.       Deflation — falling prices — is unthinkable, and would cause a catastrophic depression.
8.       The best tax is a "flat" income tax, proportionate to income across the board, with no exemptions or deductions.
9.       An income tax cut helps everyone because not only the taxpayer but also the government will benefit, since tax revenues will rise when the rate is cut.
10.   Imports from countries where labor is cheap cause unemployment in the United States.
This is a very impressive performance by Alex Nowrasteh. 
Tucker Carlson is very smart, has “home court advantage”, and is generally correct on many (most?) issues.  Carlson is stellar and knows how to debate much better than the lefty snowflakes he usually argues against, but he clearly loses this debate.
Of course, the liberal, war monger GOPer John McCain is viewed favorably by both parties ... because IMO, he is the single worst senator in Congress.
Quote of the day from FFF Daily email
Every man and woman in society has one big duty. That is, to take care of his or her own self. This is a social duty. For, fortunately, the matter stands so that the duty of making the best on one's self individually is not a separate thing from the duty of filling one's place in society, but the two are one, and the latter is accomplished when the former is done.” – William Graham Sumner.
This leads one to think of Ayn Rand and the virtue of selfishness.
I don’t know if this is true.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev has appointed his wife, Mehriban Aliyeva, as the country’s first vice president. Aliyeva professed to be humbled by the appointment. ‘Mr. President, I express my deep gratitude to you for this high confidence in me,’ she said at a meeting of the Security Council. ‘Over the past years, your ideas of statehood, patriotism, your courageous protection of Azerbaijan’s national interests, and your unity with the people of Azerbaijan were an example for me.’”

Monday, February 20, 2017

Quote of the Day and the Ignorance of a Universal Basic Income

"The purpose of the economy is not to make jobs. Jobs are infinite. We can make construction workers use teaspoons instead of shovels and that will make for more jobs."
Deirdre McCloskey

This is why I laugh when I hear anyone say anything about a universal basic income.  You are economically ignorant if you support it.  It really is as simple as that.  Bill Gates and Elon Musk, both of which have advocated the UBI recently, are great business men but could not possibly be more mistaken on this topic.  


Another great, not necessarily related, quote "If you can do it for free, you should be free to do it for money" - Peter Jaworski.